Jill Biden Says Donald Trump’s Attacks on My Kid Are ‘Disgraceful’

During MSNBC’s coverage of the Iowa caucus on Monday, former second lady Jill Biden said that President Donald Trump’s remarks about her stepson Hunter Biden were “disgraceful.”

‘Disgraceful’

MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace said to Mrs. Biden, “You’ve been in the center of the beginnings of the primaries, but also of the national story in Washington, the impeachment trial of Donald J. Trump. How have those two things collided for your family on the campaign trail?”

RELATED: Adam Schiff Wants Trump Removed Because He Won’t Do “What’s Right For This Country”

Biden replied, “Well, you know, it’s been a little difficult. I’m a mother. I know you’re a mother. It’s hard when you see your kids attacked. But I think that voters realized this is about Donald Trump. It’s not about my son Hunter or my husband, and I think it’s disgraceful what Donald Trump has done. And we know this is all a distraction.”

She also said that Trump’s comments could be a rallying cry for supporters of her husband.

It’s All About Beating Trump

“The bottom line I think for most Iowans is they want to beat Donald Trump. That’s the bottom line,” she added. “And so if Donald Trump is doing this because he is afraid of my husband, then that turns out to be a good thing for Joe because they’re getting behind him, and they’re supporting him.”

RELATED: Valerie Biden Owens Sent Millions from Brother Joe’s Campaigns to Her Consulting Firm

Give Us a Break, Jill

Jill Biden seriously wants us to believe that her 50-year-old stepson, Hunter Biden, is somehow beyond reproach? Despite the fact that he earned a significant amount of money through the Ukraine Burisma energy firm without knowing anything about that business? And how this kind of seeming nepotism might look in the midst of a ridiculous impeachment witch hunt against President Trump that centers on U.S. dealings with Ukraine?

Give us a break.

What’s “disgraceful” is Democrats continuing to hound this President over nothing while still insisting  Joe and Hunter Biden’s Ukraine activity doesn’t deserve to be scrutinized.

You can’t blame Jill Biden for standing up for family. But that doesn’t mean certain members of her family aren’t covered in sleazy political grime.

The post Jill Biden Says Donald Trump’s Attacks on My Kid Are ‘Disgraceful’ appeared first on The Political Insider.

MSNBC Anchor Nicolle Wallace Declares Trump ‘The Enemy’

MSNBC anchor Nicolle Wallace, voicing blatant solidarity with the Democrat Party while working in a field which feigns fairness, declared President Trump to be “the enemy.”

Wallace made the comments during a wild segment in which she urged the resistance party to come together and defeat the President.

“I understand different views about the system,” she said of infighting Democrats, however, “the enemy is the guy in the Oval Office who thinks there are good people on both sides in Charlottesville.”

Of course, not only is she expressing support for the Democrats, but she’s revealing her bias by mentioning the media-generated Charlottesville hoax that we’ve debunked time and time again.

RELATED: MSNBC Panelist: It’s Time to Start Calling Trump Supporters Racist Too

Enemy of the People?

Now, wait a minute. Clowns in the media have repeatedly told us that referring to somebody as an ‘enemy’ is putting their lives in danger. How does Wallace get away with this?

Telling, isn’t it, that when the President refers to the media as the ‘enemy’ he is referring to their actions against the American people. When Wallace mentions ‘enemy’ she is referring to Trump being against the Democrat party.

Trump is an enemy of Democrats, the media is an ally of theirs and an enemy of the people.

Wallace continued with her rant …

“The enemy is the guy in the Oval Office who got a permission slip to cheat in presidential elections,” she said without evidence. “The enemy is a guy who calls his generals dopes and losers. I am nauseous when I see Democrats fight amongst themselves.”

Wallace concluded by saying she was so disgusted with President Trump that she’d vote for “an automobile” if the Democrats ran one as a candidate.

RELATED: Flashback: Democrat Strategist Agrees With Trump, Media has Become the Enemy of the American People

Reality Bites

In reality, it is the media that stands as the enemy of everyone with their thoroughly biased coverage and working in conjunction with the resistance party.

We saw the enemy in action recently when the New York Times introduced excerpts from John Bolton’s book in a last-ditch effort to sway the impeachment trial in the Senate.

We see the enemy on MSNBC when their panelists claim the President would like to ’round up people and murder them.’

Or when MSNBC panelists tell their colleagues to openly call Trump supporters racist.

Or when the media colluded with Democrats to doctor the transcript of the Trump-Ukraine phone call to create a narrative that never existed.

“The FAKE NEWS media is not my enemy,” President Trump previously declared, “it is the enemy of the American People!”

Wallace is proving him right.

The post MSNBC Anchor Nicolle Wallace Declares Trump ‘The Enemy’ appeared first on The Political Insider.

LOL! Schiff Says Democrats Proved Their Case Against Pres. Trump!

Rep. Adam Schiff, the lead House impeachment manager, claims Democrats could not have done anything differently to convince U.S. Senators to remove Pres. Trump.

America has a burning question for Schiff, “If you proved the case against President Trump, then why did you need to call witnesses during the Senate trial? What would they have added to the superb case you had already constructed?”

Which is it, Adam? You claim you proved your case in the Senate trial, yet you clamored for more witnesses to be called which indicates you didn’t do a complete job of convincing in the House trial that you needed to have a “do-over” in the Senate. No wonder they call you “Shifty Schiff.”

MORE NEWS: Stephen King Wants Warren to “Open a Large Can of Whup-Ass on Trump”

The Democrats as a whole didn’t prove anything. They claimed unfairness, but the fact is they had 17 Witnesses and 72 days to provide documents, and instead, they had closed-door sessions without the president’s Council. They were fully aware that by withholding the articles of impeachment that their subpoenas were null and void, which is why they attempted to intimidate Republican senators into cave in to their demands.

They failed to produce their overwhelming amount of evidence that they claimed to have to the American people; they tried to misuse the Constitution.

Section 2.1 of the Constitution clearly says that the president of the United States has the right to investigate foreign corruption; it does not matter if it’s the Bidens or anybody else; oh, the Democrats want to undermine and challenge the authority of the office of president in every way. Secondly, the president of the United States has the sole discretion to fire any ambassador anytime he wants does not need a reason.

When it comes to facts, the Democrats concocted and misused the truth.

MORE NEWS: DNC Members Scheme to Stop Sanders at Convention

The Audacity Of The Democratic Party to scream about a fair trial when they goodnight the president of the United States his due process rights. Not only that, but in the United States court of law, you have the right to face your accuser, AKA The Whistleblower. If you decide to bring accusations against a person don’t expect to hide behind a whistleblower status, most of Schiff’s witnesses everybody knew were not credible and had honesty issues

Do you remember before he was appointed as a Member of the Benghazi Select Committee, Schiff called the establishment of a select committee to investigate the 2012 attack a “colossal waste of time,” and said Democratic leaders should not appoint any members, stating: “I think it’s just a tremendous red herring and a waste of taxpayer resources.”

The only case they proved was the case that they’d spent three years trying to remove Trump from office and have failed. They will keep trying, but smart people will move on.

MORE NEWS: Ilhan Omar: My First Impression of America Was Disappointment

Oh yeah, Rep. Jerry Nadler didn’t agree with Schiff, which is why Jerry went to the microphone to give the closing statement while Schiff called his name four times. The dysfunctional Jerry Springer House counsel finally began throwing punches when they realized the others were cheating with each other’s sisters and brothers.

The bottom line here is that Schiff proved that the Democrats wanted to undo the election at all costs. They will now pay the price by giving the Republicans control of all branches of the Government and the next two Supreme Court Justices.

More News from WayneDupree.com

 

 

 

The post LOL! Schiff Says Democrats Proved Their Case Against Pres. Trump! appeared first on The Political Insider.

Stephen King Wants Warren to “Open a Large Can of Whup-Ass on Trump”

The novelist Stephen King said that he was backing Elizabeth Warren in the Democratic primaries, and wants to see her “open a large can of whup-ass” on President Trump.

“I’m Pulling for Elizabeth Warren”

“I’ll support and work for any Democrat who wins the nomination, but I’m pulling for Elizabeth Warren,” Stephen King tweeted. “I’d love to see her open a large can of whup-ass on Trump in the debates,” he added.

The leftist author has a history of attacking President Trump in a rather vile manner. King has described the President as a “vile, racist and incompetent bag of guts and waters,” a “horse’s ass,” and “as crooked as a broken nose and as dumb as a fencepost.”

RELATED: Stephen King Mistakes “MS-13” as a Firearm

King also recently attacked Republican Senators Collins and Murkowski for voting the way they did in the vote regarding whether or not to call witnesses in President Trump’s impeachment trial, insinuating that the Russians were behind it all.

“Republican Murkowski, not up for re-election, voted against witnesses. Republican Collins, up for re-election, voted for witnesses. Both will vote to acquit,” he wrote. “It’s Moscow Mitch at his finest. Hey hey, ho ho, Susan Collins has got to go.”

Not a Surprise Endorsement

It should therefore come as no surprise that Stephen King has endorsed Warren. Like King, Warren also loves to hate and attack President Trump for just getting on with the job he was elected to do. Warren vowed that if she became President, she would immediately launch a special taskforce of the Department of Justice to investigate supposed corruption within the Trump administration, which she described as “the most corrupt administration in history!”

RELATED: Elizabeth Warren Attacks Christian Schools That Have “Anti-LGBTQ Policies”

However, I wonder how Mr King would truly fare under a Warren presidency. King actually came under fire recently by leftists himself, after he tweeted that quality was more important than diversity “in matters of art,” as “to do otherwise would be wrong.” These comments were absolutely unacceptable to them, and some described King as “backward and ignorant,” with others described his comments as “painful to read.”

As Warren loves to clamp down on your freedom of speech, I’m sure it wouldn’t be long before some of the non-binary members of her cabinet push for hate speech laws, which King may then fall foul of! In the words of Alanis Morissette, isn’t it ironic?

The post Stephen King Wants Warren to “Open a Large Can of Whup-Ass on Trump” appeared first on The Political Insider.

Stephen King Wants Warren to “Open a Large Can of Whup-Ass on Trump”

The novelist Stephen King said that he was backing Elizabeth Warren in the Democratic primaries, and wants to see her “open a large can of whup-ass” on President Trump.

“I’m Pulling for Elizabeth Warren”

“I’ll support and work for any Democrat who wins the nomination, but I’m pulling for Elizabeth Warren,” Stephen King tweeted. “I’d love to see her open a large can of whup-ass on Trump in the debates,” he added.

The leftist author has a history of attacking President Trump in a rather vile manner. King has described the President as a “vile, racist and incompetent bag of guts and waters,” a “horse’s ass,” and “as crooked as a broken nose and as dumb as a fencepost.”

RELATED: Stephen King Mistakes “MS-13” as a Firearm

King also recently attacked Republican Senators Collins and Murkowski for voting the way they did in the vote regarding whether or not to call witnesses in President Trump’s impeachment trial, insinuating that the Russians were behind it all.

“Republican Murkowski, not up for re-election, voted against witnesses. Republican Collins, up for re-election, voted for witnesses. Both will vote to acquit,” he wrote. “It’s Moscow Mitch at his finest. Hey hey, ho ho, Susan Collins has got to go.”

Not a Surprise Endorsement

It should therefore come as no surprise that Stephen King has endorsed Warren. Like King, Warren also loves to hate and attack President Trump for just getting on with the job he was elected to do. Warren vowed that if she became President, she would immediately launch a special taskforce of the Department of Justice to investigate supposed corruption within the Trump administration, which she described as “the most corrupt administration in history!”

RELATED: Elizabeth Warren Attacks Christian Schools That Have “Anti-LGBTQ Policies”

However, I wonder how Mr King would truly fare under a Warren presidency. King actually came under fire recently by leftists himself, after he tweeted that quality was more important than diversity “in matters of art,” as “to do otherwise would be wrong.” These comments were absolutely unacceptable to them, and some described King as “backward and ignorant,” with others described his comments as “painful to read.”

As Warren loves to clamp down on your freedom of speech, I’m sure it wouldn’t be long before some of the non-binary members of her cabinet push for hate speech laws, which King may then fall foul of! In the words of Alanis Morissette, isn’t it ironic?

The post Stephen King Wants Warren to “Open a Large Can of Whup-Ass on Trump” appeared first on The Political Insider.

Nancy Pelosi Says Even if President Trump is Acquitted ‘He Will Not Be Acquitted’

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi left members of the press confused during her weekly briefing Thursday when she said that President Trump “will not be acquitted” even if he actually is acquitted by the United States Senate.

‘He will not be acquitted’

“When this is over, do you think that President Trump will understand that he’s got a Congress watching this? Or will he be emboldened because the Senate will have acquitted him?” asked a reporter.

“Well, he will not be acquitted. You cannot be acquitted if you don’t have a trial. You don’t have a trial if you don’t have witnesses and documentation,” replied Pelosi.

Pelosi then doubled-down in saying she wanted more witnesses in the ongoing Senate impeachment trial, insisting that Republicans must allow further investigations or “pay a price.”

“It’s about a fair trial. They take an oath to have a fair trial. We think that would include witnesses and documentation. The ball is now in their court, so either do that or pay a price,” warned Pelosi.

RELATED: Pelosi Frets: End of the World If Trump Wins in 2020

Pelosi spoke with reporters Thursday after signing her Articles of Impeachment, saying the entire process is not a “question of proof” but “allegations.”

“It’s not a question of proof, it says what allegations have been made. That has to be subjected to scrutiny as to how we go forward, but it should not be ignored in the context of other events that could substantiate some of that,” said Pelosi.

RELATED: Democrats Have Already Decided Trump is Guilty, They Just Need To Find Something To Make Him So

Pelosi Living in Fantasy Land

What kind of fantasy land is Pelosi living in?

If the Senate acquits President Trump, which it looks like they will likely do this week, how in the world can she still say “he will not be acquitted?”

Trump Derangement Syndrome obviously takes many forms. The usual TDS is just partisan Democrats saying ridiculous things just to oppose Trump.

But now the Speaker of the House believes even if the President is acquitted, he really won’t be? An elected official of this ranking is just going to completely ignore reality?

If this isn’t proof the Democrats have completely lost it, I don’t know what is.

The post Nancy Pelosi Says Even if President Trump is Acquitted ‘He Will Not Be Acquitted’ appeared first on The Political Insider.

Buttigieg: 63 Million People Might Have Voted for Trump But All of Them Are Still Racist

2020 Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg has said time and again that he believes Americans who voted for President Donald Trump are racist. On Sunday, CNN’s Jake Tapper asked Buttigieg if he regretted saying this.

Does Pete Buttigieg Really Believe 63 Million Americans are Racist?

“Republicans have been seizing, including in a new Trump ad, a statement you made that ‘Anyone who supported this president is, at best, looking the other way on racism.’ You’ve also said that on my show,” Tapper explained. “That’s almost 63 million Americans who you’re painting with a pretty broad brush. Do you regret saying that at all?”

Buttigieg responded without hesitation.

RELATED: Team Trump Airs Super Bowl Ad Touting President’s Important Criminal Justice Reform

“No. I’m very concerned about the racial division that this president has fostered,” the former South Bend, Indiana mayor explained. “And I’m meeting a lot of voters who are no longer willing to look the other way on that, looking for a new political home.”

Polls Show Trump Approval is Up with Minority Voters

If Buttigieg believes Trump and his supporters represent racism, a host of recent polls might bely that argument.

An Emerson poll in early December put Trump at 35 percent with black voters and 38 percent with Hispanics.

“If you add in Asian voters at 28 percent approval,” notes Emerson’s director of polling Spencer Kimball, “our number is very close to the new Marist poll,” which finds Trump’s approval at 33 percent among non-white voters. Trump received 34 percent approval among black voters in a recent RasmussenReports poll, and a CNN poll puts Trump’s approval among non-white voters at 26 percent.

Rush Limbaugh said of these polls, “We’ve got three polls today showing Donald Trump at 30 percent or higher with black voters. We’ve got Emerson, we’ve got Rasmussen and we’ve got Marist!”

RELATED: Biden’s Strange New Anti-Trump Ad: Same Old Message, Same Likely Result

‘You can’t dispute the fact that African-Americans have been benefiting from President Trump’s policies’

“You can’t dispute the fact that African-Americans have been benefiting from President Trump’s policies,” said Katrina Pierson with the Trump campaign. “Four years ago, the president asked the black community, ‘What do you have to lose;’ now we are thinking, ‘Imagine what we stand to gain!’”

No doubt the unemployment rate falling to a 50-year-low has something to do with Trump’s rising popularity with non-white voters.

Buttigieg can continue to call Trump supporters racist all he wants. He’ll be lucky to get anywhere near the Democratic nomination–much less the only poll that counts in November.

The post Buttigieg: 63 Million People Might Have Voted for Trump But All of Them Are Still Racist appeared first on The Political Insider.

Video: I Cried When I Watched Super Bowl LIV ‘Ragged Old Flag’ Tribute By Johnny Cash And Here’s Why

I pledge allegiance to the flag of The United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

Johnny Cash was hands down the most badass country singer in history!

I cried, and I am not ashamed to let anyone know because I love my flag, and I hate that citizens in this country continue to disrespect her.

RELATED: Political Super Bowl Ad Likely to Backfire

I’m a very proud Veteran, and I love that flag more than words can say. No matter where I was deployed, I always had our flag there. My oath of enlistment will end when I die ( United States Air Force, 1987-1995 and served in Operation Desert Storm/Shield). I love my country, dearly, and I fought hard for it. I hope I made a difference; I tried my heart out too.

Anyone who hates that flag, hate the millions who died to protect them. Think about that. Men and women with families and dreams died to protect your rights to speak your mind. And just because you want to say something wretched and nasty about this country, doesn’t mean you should.

I get chills when Johnny says, “because she’s been through the fire before, and I believe she can take a lot more.” I love this country, and I love my fellow Americans who feel the same way as me.

I think that every American should listen to this song, and if they don’t feel proud and have a tear in their eye, maybe they should think about not considering themselves American.

MORE NEWS: ‘Superbad’ Star Jonah Hill Says ‘Real Change’ In Movies Will Only Happen When Women And Minorities Run Studios

This right here is why I’m not only proud to be American. I’m damn proud of every soldier that has ever fought and died for that “ragged old flag.” This should be our national anthem.

I don’t know about you but I wish it were still those times. May have not been any better than today, but at least families were closer and stronger or that’s just how I feel, people are way too into technology, and not out in the real world.

We are lucky to live in this great country. I am so sick of everyone protesting this or that. We need a day of no protest, where we should all appreciate the fact that we are Americans first and agree to disagree peacefully and politely! We need peace.

RIP all brave men and women that died defending Old Glory.

It makes me tear up every time.

More Stories on WayneDupree.com

 

The post Video: I Cried When I Watched Super Bowl LIV ‘Ragged Old Flag’ Tribute By Johnny Cash And Here’s Why appeared first on The Political Insider.