Melania Trump Reveals Her Post-White House Plans – She’s Going To Maintain ‘Be Best’

The former First Lady Melania Trump has revealed some of her post-White House plans, as she is reportedly starting an office in Palm Beach, Florida, in part to “maintain ‘Be Best.'”

Melania’s Post-White House Plans

This was revealed in a CNN report, which stated that Melania’s post-White House staff will include three familiar staffers: Hayley D’Antuono, who previously served as her director of operations and trip supervisor; Mary Finzer, who previously managed Melania’s “gift closet;” and Marcia Kelly, a former unpaid senior adviser in the White House.

Sources said that the team is planning to initially work remotely and out of the Trumps’ private Mar-a-Lago Club, though Melania, 50, is looking for a separate office space in Palm Beach.

This comes days after former President Donald Trump announced that he is launching his own post-White House office.

Related: Melania Trump’s Final Words Before Leaving White House – ‘Being Your First Lady Was My Greatest Honor’

Palm Beach Residents Attack Trumps

This also comes after the town of Palm Beach confirmed it was reviewing whether the Trumps could legally make their residence at Mar-a-Lago, in light of an agreement that the former president signed back in 1993, according to People Magazine.

This agreement, which Trump signed after he converted his former residence into the private club, stated that no members would stay there for longer than seven days at a time.

Residents of Palm Beach have been calling on local officials to examine the issue.

“It’s a legal matter. It’s a contract,” said Palm Beach Town Manager Kirk Blouin. “We have attorneys that prepared [the use agreement] for the town … obviously it was prepared many, many years ago. So because it’s a legal matter, it is being reviewed.”

Related: Melania Trump Condemns Capitol Violence – Leftist Media Pounces On First Lady’s Response

After launching “Be Best,” Melania said that she was alright with criticism, explaining in 2018, “It is not news or surprising to me that critics and the media have chosen to ridicule me for speaking out on this issue, and that’s okay.”

“I remain committed to tackling this topic because it will provide a better world for our children,” she continued. 

“And I hope that, like I do, you will consider using their negative words as motivation to do all you can to bring awareness and understanding about responsible online behavior,” Melania added. 

This piece was written by James Samson on January 30, 2021. It originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.

Read more at LifeZette:
RNC Chair McDaniel Lays Out Mundane Agenda
Schumer Unloads On Republicans Refusing To Support Impeachment – Vows To Hold Trial
Ilhan Omar Says If Republicans Won’t Remove ‘Dangerous And Violent’ Marjorie Taylor Greene, Then ‘We Must Do It’

The post Melania Trump Reveals Her Post-White House Plans – She’s Going To Maintain ‘Be Best’ appeared first on The Political Insider.

Tulsi Gabbard Torches Pelosi For Describing GOP As ‘Enemy Within The House’ – ‘Like Throwing A Match Into A Tinderbox’

Earlier this week, we reported that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) had slammed her Republican colleagues as the “enemy within the House.” Now, former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) is speaking out to let Pelosi know that she feels this was inappropriate of her to say.

Pelosi Attacks Republicans 

Pelosi used her weekly press conference on Thursday to shame Republicans, saying, “I do believe, and I have said this all along, that we will probably need a supplemental for more security for members when the enemy is within the House of Representatives, a threat that members are concerned about in addition to what is happening outside.”

When asked what she meant by “the enemy” within, Pelosi doubled-downed by saying, “It means that we have members of Congress who want to bring guns on the floor and have threatened violence on other members of Congress.”

Related: Pelosi Claims ‘The Enemy Is Within The House’ As She Calls Out Armed Colleagues As Security Threats

Gabbard Fires Back

Gabbard went on “The Ingraham Angle” on Friday night to slam Pelosi for these comments.

“This kind of broad, inflammatory rhetoric is like throwing a match into the tinderbox,” Gabbard said of Pelosi’s remarks. As for Pelosi’s claim that Republican lawmakers threatened “violence on other members of Congress,” Gabbard called for Pelosi to get law enforcement involved if the threats are legitimate.

“What Speaker Pelosi is talking about is a very serious thing,” Gabbard told Fox News host Lauran Ingraham. “If there is evidence to back what she is saying … is true, this is a legal issue for law enforcement. Because members of Congress are not above the law either.”

“Isn’t this also inciting?” Ingraham asked. “If you think there is someone among the Republican caucus who’s actively plotting the murder of Nancy Pelosi or other members of Congress, that could then bring violence upon those individuals.”

“That’s really the issue here. If this is a criminal threat, let law enforcement deal with it,” Gabbard replied. “If there is no evidence of what she is talking about, and if it is not true, it is inciting further division and further harm potentially and further destroying the possibility of our country coming together.”

Related: Tulsi Gabbard Hammers Schiff, Brennan As ‘Domestic Enemies’ More Dangerous Than Capitol Protesters

Gabbard Challenges Pelosi

Not stopping there, Gabbard issued a challenge to Pelosi.

“This is why it’s so important for Nancy Pelosi – again if these accusations are baseless – she needs to apologize, not so much to her colleagues but really to the American people who right now, more than ever, need leadership coming from the speaker of the House, who represents all members of Congress and the American people to bring us together,” she said. 

“For her and President Biden to deescalate these tensions, to turn down the temperature, to denounce those who are seeking to undermine our civil liberties and our constitutional rights, and who are inflaming these tensions,” Gabbard continued. “To say, ‘Hey, we’re all Americans, and we need to come together.'”

Ingraham then questioned if Democrats were trying to weaponize the Capitol riots that took place earlier this month “to justify future encroachment on civil liberties.” She added that Democrats may be “setting the stage” for “aggressive gun control,” putting a “wall around the Capitol,” or making Washington, D.C. a state.

“I share your same concerns,” Gabbard said in agreement, reasoning that if the “party in charge can extend this kind of government overreach and using the military and intelligence agencies against people who are of the opposing party or hold different views, then what’s to say the next party who comes in and takes charge can’t do the same? That really leaves us with a banana republic, not a democracy.”

This piece was written by James Samson on January 30, 2021. It originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.

Read more at LifeZette:
RNC Chair McDaniel Lays Out Mundane Agenda
Schumer Unloads On Republicans Refusing To Support Impeachment – Vows To Hold Trial
Ilhan Omar Says If Republicans Won’t Remove ‘Dangerous And Violent’ Marjorie Taylor Greene, Then ‘We Must Do It’

The post Tulsi Gabbard Torches Pelosi For Describing GOP As ‘Enemy Within The House’ – ‘Like Throwing A Match Into A Tinderbox’ appeared first on The Political Insider.

McConnell is terrified of Trump, but why isn’t he worried about a center-right Republican revolt?

When Mitch McConnell gave a hint that—following that little thing where violent Trump supporters engaged in a deadly insurgency where they pushed aside police and went roaming the halls of Congress for congressional hostages—it might possibly, maybe, be okay to, just this once, hold Donald Trump accountable for inciting sedition, the response was simple. Trump broke out a few Patriot Party pins, hinting that he and his remaining followers might just slink away to some place where they were free to stage all the insurrections they liked without the pesky threat of someone wiggling The Finger of Concern. That was all it took to snap McConnell and crew back into line. Only five Republicans in the Senate were even willing to allow that impeaching Trump is constitutional, a question that is about as controversial as “is the sky blue?”

The ease with which Trump’s threat to shave some fraction of the party’s voters away generated boot-clicks (and licks), raises the question: Why doesn’t someone else do this? It’s possible to debate whether “sane conservative party” is an oxymoron, but back before the election—and even before the previous election—there were plenty of Republicans who claimed they were ready to pull up stakes and start a new party to save the old Grand Old.

So why haven’t they?

Here’s conservative author Tom Nichols writing in The Atlantic back in September 2020.

I was a Republican for most of my adult life.

[…]

I understand the attachment to that GOP, even among those who have sworn to defeat Donald Trump, but the time for sentimentality is over. That party is long gone. Today the Republicans are the party of “American carnage” and Russian collusion, of scams, plots, and weapons-grade contempt for the rule of law. The only decent, sensible, and conservative position is to vote against this Republican Party at every level, and bring the sad final days of a once-great political institution to an end. Then build the party back up again—from scratch.

Instead, argues Nichols, sensible conservatives should allow the GOP to crash and burn, so that it can be resurrected or replaced by a new “center-right party.”

A month later, conservative pundit Max Boot pulled out one of history’s most famous misquotes to make his point.

“We had to destroy the village in order to save it.” That famous, if probably apocryphal, quote from the Vietnam War describes how I feel about the Republican Party. We have to destroy the party in order to save it. 

As a lifelong Republican until Nov. 9, 2016 — and as a foreign policy adviser to three Republican presidential candidates—it gives me no joy to write those words. It’s true that the party had long-standing problems—conspiracy-mongering, racism, hostility toward science—that Donald Trump was able to exploit. But he has also exacerbated all of those maladies, just as he made the coronavirus outbreak much worse than it needed to be.

Instead, says Boot, America needs a … sane center-right party. 

Then in December, well after the election, when it was clear Trump was going to keep clawing away at the party no matter what, the Never Trumpers’ never Trump Evan McMullin popped up in The New York Times to keep on pounding that drum. 

So what’s next for Republicans who reject their party’s attempts to incinerate the Constitution in the service of one man’s authoritarian power grabs? Where is our home now?

The answer is that we must further develop an intellectual and political home, for now, outside of any party. From there, we can continue working with other Americans to defeat Mr. Trump’s heirs, help offer unifying leadership to the country and, if the Republican Party continues on its current path, launch a party to challenge it directly.

These are far from the only voices to raise the idea of walking away from the Republican Party of Trump and taking their ball elsewhere. Though in the immediate aftermath of Trump’s election Republicans were still talking about just waiting him out then dragging the party back to center, everyone acknowledges that this is no longer possible. The Republican Party isn’t just a party led by Trump, it’s a party about Trump. With ideas and a foundation that goes no deeper than Trump’s.

And why not? It may be easy to see that under Trump Republicans managed to lose the House, then the White House, then the Senate. What’s less clear is how thoroughly they’ve cleansed their institutional memory. Of Republicans now serving in the House, 85% have never served under a Republican president who was not Donald Trump. He is all that they know.

That may explain why most congressional Republicans are so quick to roll over when Trump snaps his fingers. It doesn’t explain why no one has followed through on the plan that conservatives have been talking up since before Trump took office. A whole cadre of Republicans from Jeff Flake to Justin Amash left the GOP—and their positions in Congress—after getting crossways with Trump. None of them has been out there on the hustings ringing the bell for the New Center-Right Party of Traditional Republican Dreams.

Donald Trump may not be able to get an accused pedophile elected in Alabama, or boost an inside trader back to office in Georgia. But he has demonstrated repeatedly that he can raise the temperature of his supporters high enough to knock good candidates out of Republican primaries. And there’s no doubt that Trump means it when he says he lives for revenge. Whether it’s Mitt Romney or Liz Cheney, every single Republican who supported Trump’s impeachment (#1 or #2) is certain to get meet a frothing Trump supporter in their next primary.

So why don’t they beat Trump at his own game? Why aren’t Romney and Murkowski parked in McConnell’s office letting him know that, unless he encourages the party to wake up and smell reality, they’re going to start a new party? Bring in Flake. Bring in Amash. Enlist the pens of all those pundits and the pocketbooks of the Lincoln Project. Put up a New Republican Party candidate for every House and Senate seat.

After all, their threat is just as good as Trump’s. They don’t have to be able to win. They don’t even have to be able to swing a majority of Republicans with them. In a lot of districts they’d need to persuade just 10%, or 5%, or 2% of Republicans to join them to make sure the GOP loses a slot. And that’s what all those pundits and former officeholders and real red Republicans have been saying—the party needs to get a few shots until it wakes up and comes back to itself.

So again, why aren’t they doing it? The biggest reason is … they don’t really mean it. Or at least they don’t mean it enough to put in more work that writing a guest column.

Saturday Snippets: Racial disparity plagues vaccination effort; migrant deaths soar; SC rep censured

Saturday Snippets is a regular weekend feature of Daily Kos.

A larger version of the chart can be found here.

AP analysis finds racial disparity in vaccination drive: The Associated Press took an early look at 17 states and two cities that have released racial breakdowns of people receiving inoculations against the raging coronavirus through Jan. 25. Results: African Americans are getting injections at levels below their share of the general population, “in some cases significantly below. In North Carolina, for example, Black people make up 22% of the population and 26% of the health care workforce, but they are only 11% of vaccine recipients so far. White people, including both Hispanic and non-Hispanic whites, make up 68% of the population and 82% of people who have been inoculated. That’s especially disturbing since severe illness and deaths from the pandemic have afflicted Black people disproportionately. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have found that African Americans and American Indians are dying at almost three times the rate of white people. Said Dr. Uché Blackstock, CEO of Advancing Health Equity, an advocacy group that addresses bias and inequality, “We’re going to see a widening and exacerbation of the racial health inequities that were here before the pandemic and worsened during the pandemic if our communities cannot access the vaccine.” The reasons for the disparity includes distrust among Black Americans because of long history of discriminatory medical treatment, poor access to the vaccine in Black neighborhoods, and less access to the internet when a large proportion of vaccination applications are being taken online. Regarding the reluctance of many Black people to be vaccination, Dr. Michelle Fiscus, the chief of Tennessee’s inoculation effort, “We have to be working very hard to rebuild that trust and get these folks vaccinated,” said. “They’re dying. They’re being hospitalized.” 

There’s more behind the racial disparity that has been clear in statistics from the beginning.  Priorities were set for distributing vaccines to people in more highly valued roles—doctors and nurses—who are more likely to be white than "essential workers" who are part of support staffs. Some states have placed put those essential workers in the very last category to receive the vaccine. On top of all that, in many states, distribution locations tend NOT to be in Black neighborhoods.

CDC issues masks be worn on public transportation: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued an order late Friday mandating all travelers to wear a mask on nearly all forms of public transportation starting Tuesday as part of the effort to stop the spread of the coronavirus, which has already killed 448,000 Americans. Masks will also be required at airport and bus terminals as well as train and subway stations. On his first day in office, President Joe Biden issued an executive order mandating masks for passengers in all interstate travel. “America’s transportation systems are essential,” said CDC Director Dr. Rochelle P. Walensky, MD, MPH. “Given how interconnected most transportation systems are across our nation and the world, when infected persons travel on public conveyances without wearing a mask and with others who are not wearing masks, the risk of interstate and international transmission can grow quickly.” The move is, of course, a sharp departure from what was done under the Trump regime up until two weeks ago. Trump made a big show of not wearing a mask and ridiculing people who did. Children under 2 and people who for medical reasons cannot wear a mask are exempt. Operators must remove passengers who refuse to wear a mask "at the earliest opportunity," according to the CDC order. Said Biden, "The experts say by wearing a mask from now until April, we'd save more than 50,000 lives going forward."

MIDDAY TWEET

President Biden has extended the eviction moratorium through March 31. But there is so much more to be done. We all should have access to safe and stable housing. https://t.co/KaKxcegKqx

— ACLU (@ACLU) January 30, 2021

Deaths of migrants crossing from Mexico into the U.S. hit record in 2020A record number of migrants seeking to cross the Mexico-U.S. border in Arizona died on their journey last year, with the remains of 227 found, according to the advocacy group Humane Borders. Since 1998, it’s estimated that at least 7,000 migrants have died trying to cross, and that number is almost certainly an undercount. The area is characterized by isolated wilderness and extreme temperatures. “This was the hottest summer ever, and we saw the most recorded deaths ever. It’s a reminder of how dangerous the border can be,” said Douglas Ruopp, chair of the group, which, among other things stashes water for migrants crossing the arid lands in the region. Donald Trump made a priority out of building a wall to keep out migrants. “That’s a longstanding tradition, these barriers and walls have pushed people into more remote and treacherous terrain,” said Jeremy Slack, an assistant professor of geography at the University of Texas-El Paso and author of Deported to Death: How Drug Violence Is Changing Migration on the Border.

Biden-Harris administration officials offer slightly mixed messages on Iran: In a speech at the United States Institute of Peace Friday, national security adviser Jake Sullivan hinted at a faster timeline than previously has been outlined for returning to a deal curtailing Iran’s nuclear development program. Donald Trump withdrew from the multilateral 2015 agreement that he verbally trashed despite the fact that international inspectors had found Iran to be in complete compliance since the signing. Like other Democratic candidates, Joe Biden had made clear in his campaign for the presidency that he would return to the agreement signed by the United States and five other nations with Iran, but only conditionally. Sullivan did not mention a key condition Biden had laid out, this being that Iran make the first move by rolling back its moves after Trump’s withdrawal to exceed the agreement’s provisions. These include Iran’s using more and more advanced centrifuges to enrich uranium, and enriching uranium above the permitted 3.75% level to 20%, which makes it much easier to reach the 90% needed for making a nuclear weapon if Iran chose to do so. Other issues are Iran’s actions across the region and its growing sophistication in missile development. “We are going to have to address Iran’s other bad behavior, malign behavior, across the region, but from our perspective, a critical early priority has to be to deal with what is an escalating nuclear crisis as they move closer and closer to having enough fissile material for a weapon,” Sullivan said. “And we would like to make sure that we reestablish some of the parameters and constraints around the program that have fallen away over the course of the past two years.” While this stress on the need to contain Iran suggests an accelerated response, Sullivan offered no timeline. “No one should over-read these comments,” a senior White House official said Saturday. “Mr. Sullivan made a general statement that the U.S. wants to put Iran’s nuclear program back in the box—which we do. Notably, he did not even mention rejoining the JCPOA, let alone in what sequence.” The JCPOA—Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action— is the formal name of the nuclear agreement. And Secretary of State Antony Blinken said from his first full day in office Wednesday that any U.S. return to the deal is still distant. “Iran is out of compliance on a number of fronts. And it would take some time, should it make the decision to do so, for it to come back into compliance and time for us then to assess whether it was meeting its obligations,” Blinken said said at a news conference. “We’re not there yet, to say the least.”

South Carolina Republicans censure lawmaker’s impeachment vote: Rep. Tom Rice of South Carolina’s 7th congressional district voted with the Democrats and nine other Republicans to impeach Donald Trump for inciting the Capitol insurrection. That landed him in hot water with state Republican leaders. And on Saturday at the quarterly meeting of the state Republican Party’s executive committee, they censured him. “We made our disappointment clear the night of the impeachment vote. Trying to impeach a president, with a week left in his term, is never legitimate and is nothing more than a political kick on the way out the door,” said SCGOP Chairman Drew McKissick in a statement. “Congressman Rice’s vote unfortunately played right into the Democrats’ game, and the people in his district, and ultimately our State Executive Committee, wanted him to know they wholeheartedly disagree with his decision,” he added. 

Gun control advocates say the NRA laid the foundation for Capitol insurrection: Although nobody is saying the National Rifle Association didn’t itself promote the murderous assault on the Capitol, the ideology connecting all the fringe groups and conspiracy theorists who showed up to trash the place and hunt for politicians to string up or shoot in the head was a product of decades of propaganda and agitating by the gun lobby. "The violence that we saw at the Capitol, the firepower that they brought with them, may not have been part of the NRA's call. But they're responsible for getting us to this moment," said Nick Suplina, managing director for law and policy at Everytown for Gun Safety, an gun violence prevention organization founded and funded by Michael Bloomberg. "They should not be allowed to distance themselves from the Frankenstein monster that they've created. This is the NRA's handiwork. Years of conspiracy peddling, fear-mongering that the government is going to come take your guns and your freedom, and the call upon Americans to do something about it, to take action, that's what we saw on Jan. 6. That base of militia groups and white supremacist groups and other extremists has been listening to the NRA's talking points for years, and we saw it play out." Everytown released a report noting that police have seized more than 3,000 rounds of ammunition and arrested nine people on weapons charges related to the insurrection. But that could be an undercount given that only a few people were searched. More than 150 people have been charged since.

Hillary Clinton calls on Tim Ryan to run for Senate in Ohio in 2022.

 Pardons Trump didn’t give are the real scandal. Here’s one.

• Only Accountability Will Allow the U.S. to Move Forward, by Mitch Landrieu.

• There Is No GOP Civil War. The Party Has Already Chosen Trumpism, by Nathalie Baptiste.