Senators brace for the unknown as Trump impeachment defense wraps


A sense of uncertainty hung over the Capitol Tuesday as President Donald Trump’s impeachment finale arrived.

It’s the last uninterrupted chance for his lawyers to persuade senators to summarily reject the House’s case for his removal — without the drama that would result from demanding new evidence. But it arrived amid a creeping anxiety that new revelations, like the one late Sunday from former national security adviser John Bolton that exploded a core premise of Trump’s defense, could be in store.

And Democrats are counting on it.

"In a few weeks or a few months do my Republican colleagues want to pick up the paper and read that one of the witnesses they blocked had crucial information about the president's misconduct?" Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said Tuesday morning. "At this point, how can Senate Republicans not vote for the witnesses and documents we’re seeking?"

The claim from Bolton that Trump explicitly linked a freeze on military aid to Ukraine with investigations of his political rivals has driven up the pressure on Republicans senators to, at the very least, demand his testimony and documents. Bolton’s claims were contained in an unpublished book manuscript first reported by The New York Times.

It prompted one last-minute proposal from Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) — backed Tuesday by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) — to obtain and review a copy of the book in a classified setting. Schumer quickly rejected the proposal as "absurd," saying a book should not need to be kept in a secure facility and calling it an effort to deflect from Democrats' demand to call witnesses.

The development also served as a reminder that the case against Trump has unfolded more rapidly than lawmakers can handle, and new evidence could emerge at any moment. Separately, a top former aide to Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelensky told The Daily Beast that Ukraine did in fact feel "rattled" by Trump's request that the country investigate his Democratic rivals. That undercut another Trump team defense: That Ukraine did not feel pressured by Trump's call for the probes.

The rapidly shifting landscape has left Senate Republicans facing a tricky calculus just as the House’s prosecutors are preparing to retake the stage. The seven House Democrats prosecuting the case will join Trump’s lawyers for a 16-hour question-and-answer session with senators, spread over two to three days.

Trump's team is expected to present an abbreviated final argument on Wednesday before the Senate adjourns and leaders hash out the process for the question-and-answer portion of the trial. In the 1999 trial of Bill Clinton, senators wrote their questions and submitted them to the chief justice, who then read them aloud. Back then, Republicans and Democrats alternated asking questions and were required to direct their inquiries to either the president's lawyer or the House prosecutors — not both. And the lawyers were asked to make a good faith attempt to answer directly and succinctly, rather than filibuster.


Trump’s defense spent Monday meandering between philosophical and procedural objections to the House’s charges against him. There was only a limited effort to push back on the facts Democrats presented, and there were presentations in defense of Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani’s actions in Ukraine, as well as protracted attacks on Joe Biden and Barack Obama.

The White House team’s offensive against Biden appeared to shift the rhetoric of some Senate Republicans. Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa even questioned whether the former vice president would be damaged by the impeachment proceedings in next week’s Iowa caucuses – a comment that drew a swift rebuke from Biden. In effect, the president’s team used its time Monday to accomplish what Trump sought but never received from Ukraine: a high-profile, politically damaging, innuendo-laden examination of Biden’s handling of Ukraine policy.

Monday night’s arguments were capped off by a presentation from constitutional scholar and defense lawyer Alan Dershowitz, whose performance energized Republicans — who rushed to shake his hand after the Senate adjourned for the night — and left Democrats perplexed.

“Nothing in the Bolton revelations, even if true would rise to the level of an abuse of power or an impeachable offense,” Dershowitz argued Monday night, leading some Democratic senators to look around the room or joke to their colleagues.

But by Tuesday, Dershowitz’s diversion gave way to the more pressing question of the Senate’s plans to call witnesses, a rare moment of genuine uncertainty in a chamber typically tightly controlled by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

Posted in Uncategorized

Dem Impeachment Manager Echoes Adam Schiff – This is About the Election

Rep. Jason Crow, currently serving as a Democrat impeachment manager, admits that his party’s efforts are due to the upcoming presidential election. It is a similar argument to one made by Adam Schiff recently.

Crow’s admission came during an interview with MSNBC’s Chuck Rosenberg, in which the host addressed the Democrat party’s alternating sense of urgency regarding the need to remove President Trump from office.

“Did the House move too quickly?” Rosenberg asked, noting that had the House conducted a thorough effort in the first place, they wouldn’t need the Senate to do their job now.

“No, I think the House proceeded in the way that it should have proceeded,” Crow insisted. “There was urgency, but it was also thoughtful and deliberate, it occurred over several months period of time.”

He then – perhaps accidentally – admitted what that urgency entailed.

“There is some urgency here,” Crow explained, before adding, “it does have to do with the elections that are coming up later this year.”

RELATED: Schiff: Impeachment Necessary to Stop Trump In 2020

Stunning!

You mean to tell me the Democrats are using impeachment to try and sway the election in their favor? To change the outcome of not only the 2020 election but the 2016 election as well?

Color me shocked.

Except that A) It’s already pretty obvious to anyone with a working set of eyes and ears and B) They’ve already admitted this before.

Crow’s impeachment manager colleague, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, confessed that he and his colleagues could not wait on impeachment because the threat of President Trump winning re-election is too great.

“The argument, ‘why don’t you just wait?’ comes down to this,” Schiff claimed. “‘Why don’t you just let him cheat in just one more election? Why not let him have foreign help one more time?'”

In one fell swoop, Schiff is suggesting President Trump is cheating to win in 2020 and claiming he already cheated in 2016.

Is anybody here old enough to remember when Schiff and his colleagues were telling everybody who would listen that the notion of a rigged election is ludicrous and not accepting the results is a ‘threat to democracy’?

RELATED: Adam Schiff Wants Trump Removed Because He Won’t Do “What’s Right For This Country”

This is Why They’re Doing It

It isn’t just Schiff and Crow who have flat-out said the Democrat party is trying to interfere and rig the 2020 presidential election.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who promoted Schiff and Crow to the ranks of impeachment managers, admitted recently that her party is pursuing the unpopular sham because “civilization, as we know it today, is at stake in the next election.”

Rep. Al Green, the Texas Democrat who believes articles of impeachment should address slavery, has said he’s “concerned if we don’t impeach this president, he will get re-elected.”

And Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the New York socialist and darling of the Democrat party, got this whole process rolling by warning: “We don’t have the luxury of time. Yes, this is an emergency.”

Senator Ted Cruz explained exactly why they are doing this.

“This is a partisan sham because they’re mad – the House Democrats – are mad at the American people for electing President Trump,” he said.

Now, they’re telling you exactly that, and they’re saying it to your face.

The post Dem Impeachment Manager Echoes Adam Schiff – This is About the Election appeared first on The Political Insider.

Watch: Ted Cruz Rips ‘Nasty’ Reporter Who Suggested Jailing His Kids

Ted Cruz eviscerated a reporter covering the impeachment trial for playing a “nasty game” after the latter suggested the senator’s children should be in jail.

The reporter clearly thought he was making a witty retort to Cruz’ insistence that Hunter Biden, son of former vice president Joe Biden, may be involved in corruption with a Ukrainian gas company.

The journalist dismissed Hunter’s involvement with the company and his father’s quid pro quo in demanding a prosecutor investigating them be fired under the threat of withholding aid.

“Hunter Biden got a job,” they said. “His dad was Vice President. If that’s a crime, shouldn’t half of your children be in prison?”

Cue the sad trombone. We’re sure when he wrote it down, this hack thought he was delivering an epic rebuttal. Until you realize Cruz’s children are 9 and 11-years-old.

RELATED: Ted Cruz: Democrats Made ‘Very Serious Strategic Error,’ Hunter Biden Testimony Now Needed

Cruz Shreds Democrats

Republican senators have been threatening to haul Hunter in with a subpoena during the impeachment trial as a means to understand more about President Trump’s desire to investigate corruption in Ukraine.

“We’ve just seen two hours of evidence and at a minimum, it was not only reasonable and justified but the president, I think had an obligation to investigate corruption that potentially extended to the very highest levels of government,” Cruz told reporters.

Cruz shrugged off the latest alleged ‘bombshell‘ involving former National Security Adviser John Bolton’s book and instead suggested it is Biden who is the more crucial witness.

“I get that the press loves to obsess over the latest bombshell,” Cruz responded. “Listen, I don’t know what John Bolton’s book says or doesn’t say. I’ve seen the New York Times coverage but at the end of the day, it doesn’t impact the legal issue before this Senate.”

“The legal issue before this Senate is whether a president has the authority to investigate corruption,” he continued. “So the House managers built their entire case on the proposition that investigating Burisma corruption, investigating the Bidens for corruption, was baseless and a sham. The proposition is absurd.”

Not as absurd as the media suggesting his children should be in jail if they had jobs. Which they don’t. Again, because they’re 9 and 11.

RELATED: Senator Hawley Preparing Motions to Subpoena Schiff, Bidens, Whistleblower in Impeachment Trial

Comparing Hunter to a 9-Year-Old

To his credit, Cruz keeps his cool when being confronted with such an asinine analogy that everybody surrounding him and the reporter bursts into laughter.

‘Shouldn’t half your children be in prison?’

The reporter actually had to write this down in his little journal or rehearse the question in his head and then actually said it out loud.

“My children are 9 and 11, I’m sorry you want to throw a 9-year-old in prison, but at this point, my third-grader plays basketball and softball at her school so stop playing the nasty Washington game,” Cruz shot back.

“It’s not a nasty Washington game,” came the reporter’s response.

“Attacking a 9-year-old?” Cruz scoffed, giving a slight wave of the hand and moving on to people more serious about their careers.

The post Watch: Ted Cruz Rips ‘Nasty’ Reporter Who Suggested Jailing His Kids appeared first on The Political Insider.

Bolton’s team denies leaking his book, contends White House made copies

President Donald Trump claimed to reporters Monday that he hadn't seen the manuscript from former national security adviser John Bolton’s new book, but Bolton’s team reportedly believes the White House was not only given the manuscript but made copies of it, according to NBC News. The book, which The New York Times obtained a copy of, alleges that Trump told Bolton military aid to Ukraine was being delayed until the country investigated Trump’s political adversary, which is now the central claim of the president’s impeachment trial.

NBC News correspondent Carol Lee reported Monday that one hard copy of Bolton's book was delivered to the White House in December for a national security review. "What happened to the copy of the book is unknown to Bolton's team, but it appears copies of it were made," NBC News said in its report. "Bolton's team submitted the book 'in good faith' and now feels that process was corrupted." 

In an interview with MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, Lee said Bolton’s team is contending: “Essentially it's hard to get your head around the idea you have one copy of a book and everyone is passing it around, and then all of those people are going and talking to reporters about what they read in this one copy that they've all been sharing.” Lee added: “So it suggests that there are multiple copies floating around and from the Bolton team's perspective, they're saying we give them one copy. What they did with it, we don't know, but clearly it's gotten out there and it's not coming from us. They really want to distance themselves from the idea he is somehow behind leaking this.”

RELATED: This one on John Bolton was a big, stupid lie even by Trump standards

x x YouTube Video