Ruth Bader Ginsburg decries Washington ‘dysfunction’ amid impeachment trial

As the highly-polarized impeachment trial of President Trump rages in the Senate, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg panned the "dysfunction" and "polarization" at an award ceremony in Washingon.

New Bolton revelation: ‘The kind of bombshell Mitch McConnell has been afraid of all along’

Former national security adviser John Bolton’s new revelation about White House counsel Pat Cipollone being in on Trump’s Ukraine conspiracy as early as May 2019 is dropping like a bomb on Washington. "This is the kind of bombshell that Mitch McConnell has been afraid of all along," reporter Kasie Hunt said on MSNBC.

Indeed, a day that seemed almost certainly headed toward a no-witness vote and fast acquittal just in time for Donald Trump’s victory laps on Fox News and at next week’s State of the Union address now holds a slew of question marks. Hill reporters are now musing that the Senate trial could go into next week, “maybe even mid-week,” tweeted Politico’s John Bresnahan. Trump’s already in damage control, tweeting out fantasies like a drunken sailor on hallucinogens. Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski still hasn’t announced her vote on witnesses, which is bad news for McConnell because she hasn’t owed the GOP caucus anything since 2010, when she won reelection as a write-in candidate. Murkowski’s now a “no” on witnesses.

As Americans, we should still be rooting for witnesses. The citizenry deserves to hear from Bolton in his own words, among others.

But as Democrats, we can also feast on the political peril this represents for Republicans, who have now admitted that Trump did everything House managers said he did and that they just don’t care. As commentators on MSNBC absorbed the new Bolton bombshell, they almost unanimously declared it an electoral disaster in the making for Senate Republicans, especially given where public opinion has been on witnesses all along. 

"This makes that vote against witnesses political suicide,” former GOP operative Nicolle Wallace observed, adding, “I hope they take it."

Even former Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill was bullish on the prospects for Democrats. “If these Republicans shut this trial down and say, No more,” she said, “it is a great gift to the Democrats in November.”

As Sen. Kamala Harris noted before the news dropped, "There can be no true exoneration if there's not been a fair trial. Period." Now more than ever, Senate Republicans are also on trial. At least some of them seem to know it.

Impeachment trial/Republican cover-up reaches key decision point: Live coverage #2

After a day of procedural debate and voting, six days of opening arguments, and two days of question and answer, the impeachment trial of Donald Trump could conclude Friday with debate followed by Republicans voting to end the trial and cover up Trump’s abuses of power. But Democrats will be keeping up the fight for a fair trial.

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 8:44:01 PM +00:00 · Barbara Morrill

Ongoing coverage can be found here.

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:11:35 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

Crow hands off to Hakeem Jeffries, who quickly pulls up a statement from Fiona Hill as part of pointing out the deep involvement of Mick Mulvaney—and reminding the senators of that “drug deal” quote from Bolton. This followed by a clip showing Sondland being asked about that deal. Sondland says “Yeah, a lot of people were aware of it.” Jefferies returns to the “everyone was in the loop” statement that ties Bolton’s manuscript claims to statements in the investigation.

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:13:35 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

Jeffries making it clear again that the “perfect call” was not a stand alone event. It was part of a larger conversation conducted by Giuliani, Sondland, Volker and others that started well before that call.

Jeffries calls for “let’s question Mick Mulvaney under oath.” Which, I think, is the first time today there’s been a direct call for the testimony of anyone other than Bolton.

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:16:28 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

jeffries plays an extended version of Mulvaney’s press conference statement, framing things both before and after the statements that have been shown in previous clips. Which — hopefully — gnaws away at the claims Mulvaney was either confused or misquoted.

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:21:05 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

Jeffries address the “policy disagreement” claims from Trump’s defense by repeating their own statements that Giuliani wasn’t involved in policy.

Jeffries also renews the call for Blair and Duffey — the officials who actually had to put their names on letters to DOD and others in withholding the aid. Duffey also authored notes making it clear that he and other officials at OMB were aware the hold was illegal, and instructed people to stay quiet about it.

So the House mangers are where they started in the first day of debate: Bolton, Mulvaney, Duffey, and Blair. Those are the witnesses they are requesting.

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:26:21 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

Jeffries doing a good job, again, of framing the gaps in our knowledge of what happened, how they seem to point to nothing other than malfeasance, and inviting senators to solve the mystery. He’s doing a good job of making just getting answers on OMB emails seem like something exciting and interesting.

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:29:08 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

Jeffries hands over to Zoe Lofgren.

Lofgren returns to the focus on the need for documents, speaking directly to the documents that are mentioned in testimony.

Lofgren: “But we haven’t seen any of them. I think it’s a cover-up.”

The House managers are making the same requests that they made coming in: four witnesses and specific documents. It’s hard for even Trump’s team to claim that the House is on a fishing expedition for whole new theories of the case … but they’ve made those claims, and will again in a few minutes.

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:34:09 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

Lofgren reminds the Senate again that depositions and documents are completely within their control, that they can designate Roberts to adjudicate issues of privilege, that the House team has agreed to deal with witnesses and documents within a week. And that Trump is “the architect of the very delay” that’s being used as a threat to the Senate.

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:35:31 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

Lofgren notes that Bolton, as a private citizen, is free to talk about any conversation he had with Trump that doesn’t include classified information. And that if Trump did try to invoke executive privilege “he would fail.”

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:37:31 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

Lofgren states — accurately — that Trump can’t deny the statements from Bolton, then use executive privilege to prevent Bolton from defending himself. Trump’s own morning statement is an argument that Bolton should be allowed to speak.

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:38:54 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

Schiff steps up to bring this home.

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:40:19 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

Schiff: “We agree with the president’s counsel on this much: this will set a new precedent. … if someone believes they would benefit from a trial with no witnesses, they will cite the trial of Donald J Trump.”

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:42:53 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

Schiff makes a clear argument that simply allowing Trump’s obstruction to stand is an abdication of the impeachment power, as well as Congress’ oversight authority. Trump will have been told that concealing evidence is an acceptable tactic.

Schiff: “Our country will no no longer have a government with three coequal branches.”

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:43:52 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

Schiff: “No matter what you decide to do here, no matter if you decide to let witnesses tell their story … The facts will come out. … Witnesses will tell their story in books and in hearings … the facts will come out.”

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:48:18 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

Schiff once again giving a pitch to simple honesty and common sense — everyone is going to learn the truth anyway. Why not ask while that truth can do some good? Why not show the public that Senate Republicans care about the truth?

Schiff: “A trial without witnesses is no trial at all. You either have a trial, or you don’t.” 

Schiff closes this section with a Adams quote about the importance of a fair trial. 

“Only Donald Trump, only Donald Trump of any defendant in America, can insist on a trial without witnesses or documents.”

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:49:12 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

Schiff: “The importance of a fair trial here is not less than any courtroom in America, it is greater than every courtroom in America. Because we set the example.”

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:51:04 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

Schiff wraps up his call eloquently, and McConnell calls for a short recess before Trump’s defense makes its statement on witnesses.

Friday, Jan 31, 2020 · 7:55:03 PM +00:00 · Mark Sumner

x